social

Regional Dashboard

Housing Affordability - Income Allocation Toward Housing


Autumn Terrace


Click here to view Housing Affordability Bright Spots.

What is the measure?
The percent of residents in the San Diego region who spend more than 30% of gross income on housing.

How are we doing?

A majority of renters and homeowners in San Diego County spend more than 30% of their income on rent or mortgage payments, higher than both the U.S. and California averages. As of 2011, the San Diego region had approximately 33,670 residences designated as affordable housing. SANDAG estimates San Diego will need 94,760 additional units of Very Low to Moderate Income housing units for the region in the next decade.

 Percent of Occupants Spending 30% or More of Income on Housing

Designated Affordable Housing Units

Percent of First-Time Homeowners that can Afford to Purchase Median Priced Home

Why is it important?

  • Cost of housing impacts how much residents can spend on other basic needs. Spending more than 30% of income on housing is believed by financial institutions and creditors to put consumers at financial risk, and means residents have less discretionary income to purchase other goods and services that support local businesses. In this way, housing affordability affects the whole community, not just the less fortunate.

  • Housing costs influence our region’s competitiveness against other metropolitan regions in attracting or retaining businesses and a talented workforce.

  • Housing affordability affects transportation patterns. When housing in core areas is not affordable, people move to less expensive areas, usually farther from jobs and services. This increases traffic congestion and transportation costs and impacts air quality.

  • The State of California requires our region to plan for projected population growth. This is in addition to many units that were required in the previous decade and were not built.

How Can We Improve?
Policy Options:

  • Reduce red tape for developments that qualify as affordable, through fee waivers, and/or flexible municipal code and development permit processes that allow for parking, density, setback and height concessions for very low-income rental housing.

  • Consider setting aside funding to purchase land near planned transit for development of affordable housing or to preserve existing affordable housing before transit projects drive up land and property values, as was successfully done by the Transit-Oriented Development Acquisition Fund in the San Francisco Bay Area.

  • Consider development of “shared equity” approaches such as a Regional Land Trust like the one in Silicon Valley that makes loans and grants to increase the supply of affordable housing, assist first-time homebuyers, prevent homelessness and stabilize neighborhoods.
  • [See also: Land Use - Residential Development Indicator and policy options]